Skip to main content

Minima Integration

Overview​

SELF Chain and Minima represent two distinct blockchain architectures with fundamentally different consensus mechanisms:

  • SELF Chain: Uses Proof-of-AI (PoAI) consensus exclusively
  • Minima: Uses Proof-of-Work (TxPOW) consensus

This integration enables interoperability between these two chains while preserving the integrity and independence of each consensus mechanism.

Consensus Mechanism Separation​

SELF Chain - Pure PoAI​

SELF Chain operates entirely on Proof-of-AI consensus, where:

  • AI-Block Builders create optimal blocks
  • The Voting Algorithm coordinates block selection
  • AI-Validators determine the winning block
  • Color marker validation ensures transaction integrity

Important: SELF Chain does NOT use proof-of-work in any capacity. All validation is performed through the PoAI mechanism.

Minima - TxPOW​

Minima maintains its Transaction Proof-of-Work (TxPOW) consensus where:

  • Each transaction includes its own proof-of-work
  • Users contribute to network security through transaction mining
  • The chain follows traditional PoW consensus rules

Compatibility Architecture​

Bridge Design​

The compatibility layer acts as a bridge between two sovereign chains:

SELF Chain (PoAI) <---> Compatibility Layer <---> Minima (TxPOW)

Key Principles​

  1. Consensus Independence

    • Each chain maintains its own consensus mechanism
    • No mixing or switching between consensus types
    • Transactions are validated according to their native chain rules

  2. Message Translation

    • The compatibility layer translates between chain formats
    • Does NOT change consensus requirements
    • Preserves cryptographic proofs from each chain

  3. Asset Transfer

    • Cross-chain transfers respect both chains' validation rules
    • Assets locked on one chain, minted on the other
    • Atomic swaps ensure transaction integrity

Technical Implementation​

Cross-Chain Communication​

  1. SELF to Minima

    • Transaction validated by PoAI consensus on SELF Chain
    • Proof of validation sent to compatibility layer
    • Compatibility layer creates Minima-compatible transaction
    • Minima validates according to TxPOW rules

  2. Minima to SELF

    • Transaction validated by TxPOW on Minima
    • Proof of work verified by compatibility layer
    • Transaction formatted for SELF Chain
    • PoAI consensus validates on SELF Chain

Validator Coordination​

  • SELF Validators: AI-driven validators operating under PoAI rules
  • Minima Nodes: Traditional nodes validating TxPOW
  • Bridge Validators: Specialized nodes that verify cross-chain proofs

Security Considerations​

Consensus Integrity​

  • Neither chain's consensus is compromised
  • PoAI remains the sole consensus for SELF Chain
  • TxPOW remains the sole consensus for Minima
  • No consensus "switching" or "mixing" occurs

Attack Mitigation​

  • Double-spend prevention through lock-and-mint mechanism
  • Time-locked transfers prevent rapid arbitrage attacks
  • Multi-signature requirements for large transfers
  • Independent validation on each chain

Performance Characteristics​

Transaction Flow​

  • Intra-chain: Native consensus speed (PoAI for SELF, TxPOW for Minima)
  • Cross-chain: Additional latency for bridge validation
  • Finality: Requires confirmation on both chains

Scalability​

  • Each chain scales according to its consensus mechanism
  • SELF Chain targets 50,000 TPS through PoAI optimization
  • Minima scales through its unique TxPOW approach
  • Bridge capacity designed to handle peak cross-chain demand

Use Cases​

Cross-Chain Integration Scenarios​

The compatibility layer enables various integration scenarios:

  1. Asset Bridging

    • Transfer tokens between chains
    • Maintain value across ecosystems
    • Enable liquidity sharing

  2. Ecosystem Expansion

    • Access users from both networks
    • Expand application reach
    • Share network effects

  3. Technical Interoperability

    • Cross-chain smart contract calls
    • Shared data availability
    • Unified developer experience

  4. Risk Distribution

    • Diversify across different consensus mechanisms
    • Hedge against single-chain risks
    • Enable failover capabilities

Future Enhancements​

Planned Improvements​

  1. Faster Bridge Operations: Optimized proof verification
  2. Enhanced Security: Additional validation layers
  3. Liquidity Pools: Automated market making between chains
  4. Smart Contract Interop: Cross-chain contract calls

Research Areas​

  • Zero-knowledge proofs for private cross-chain transfers
  • Quantum-resistant bridge signatures
  • AI-assisted bridge optimization
  • Decentralized bridge governance

Conclusion​

The SELF-Minima compatibility layer enables powerful interoperability between two innovative blockchain architectures. By maintaining strict separation of consensus mechanisms, both chains preserve their unique advantages while enabling users to leverage the strengths of each network.

This approach ensures that:

  • PoAI remains the exclusive consensus for SELF Chain
  • TxPOW continues to secure Minima
  • Users can seamlessly interact with both chains
  • The integrity of each consensus mechanism is preserved